Is Star Trek Due for a Reboot?
There has been a lot of rumbling lately regarding the next Star trek movie due out Christmas 2008. First, no one really seems to know exactly what the plot is or whether it is a reboot or just a new story set in the past with different actors. It is still early yet for such answers, but one does fear for the quality of the story when an element that big is still up in the air. Second, there will be big casting news revealed at the San Diego ComiCon next month. One assumes there will at least be an announcement on who is playing Captain James T. Kirk. I, for one, hope it is not Matt Damon.
Finally, there are rumors that Leonard Nimoy will make a cameo in the movie. Perhaps that means J. J. Abrams is going with the plan of having the movie be a story Spock is relaying to Starfleet Academy cadets. But wait. William Shatner is not happy he has been passed up for a cameo. According to Harlan Ellison, Shatner has been known to count lines in scripts in comparison to Nimoy, so he may very well be jealous. I will be curious to see how the alleged turmoil plays out.
I have been kicking around whether I like the idea of a reboot versus a story with new actors playing old roles. My knee jerk reaction is to say reboots are bad. But I have enjoyed both
Batman Begins and
Casino Royale, both of which smashed all previous continuity. Of course, the Batman movie franchise was relatively short lived in the grand scheme of things and the James Bond series had little continuity beyond hi wife having been killed by SPECTRE some time ago. Even that had to remain ambiguous after the creator of SPECTRE won control of his property. Of course, old Bond never could forget he once shagged Emme Peel herself. I could not. I wonder if she wore the black leather catsuit at any point in their short courtship?
But then there is the idea of prequels. For whatever reason that has been in fashion lately. I cannot imagine it was brought on by the mediocre
Star Wars: The Phantom menace, but perhaps it was. Despite being an awful movie, it was the top grossing film of 1999. Star Trek has had its own prequel already with pretty poor results. It is one of the reasons I am surprised the movie will be set in the past as well. It probably would not, nor would it even be made period, if not for the interest of successful producer J. J. Abrams. Word from him is Paramount did not care to revive the franchise at all. The news gives the impression Abrams has carte blanche to do what he wishes with the property. So here is the question: should the movie reboot or fit in continuity?
I like Star Trek. I am a bigger fan of Star Wars, but Trek has its merits. I recall watching the show as a young tyke when I was way too small to follow the story. I watched because I was a Star Wars nut and wanted to satiate my science fiction fix. My first really clear memory of Trek was watching
The Wrath of Khan in the theater. I believe I was only six years old and terrified out of my mind over the scene with the slugs crawling into the two captured Starfleet officers’ ears. I did not fully appreciate the movie until I had read
Moby Dick many years later and understood the obsession Khan had with Kirk. That is a selling point of Trek with me. It may be geeky and often preachy, but there are many literary and philosophical questions dealt with throughout. Star wars attempted a science versus religion debate, but George Lucas never spent much time developing it.
I saw the rest o the movies and liked
Star Trek: the Next Generation right of the bat. I can tell you a good part of my attachment to Trek is the large amount of time I have spent with it over the years. It was some part of my weekly routine from 1987-2005. That may sound like five television series and six movies to you, but to me it is doing homework while watching the show, going to the movie with my closest friends from junior high the college, late night discussions on the Just War Theory and
Deep Space Nine, debating the link between the Borg and Communism, recovering from eye surgery while watching
Voyager, collapsing in front of the television in law school to watch
Enterpprise and so much more. I saw at least two of the movies on my birthday. Trek has been intertwined with my comic book collecting buddies as well. The first spec script I ever wrote was for
The Next Generation. It is not just the continuity. It is the memories of a big part of my life.
Ne thing I have desperately learned in recent years is you cannot go home again. The series finale of
Enterprise featured Jonathan Frakes and Marina Sirtis reprising their roles as riker and Troi respectively. The episode was being told as a holodeck program set during a 1992 episode of
TNG. All it did for me was emind me how much better Trek was years ago. Maybe even how much happier I was at that time. Truth be told, Trek has gone downhill since
DS9, my favorite of the bunh, went off the air.
Voyager was often fun and kind of goofy, but
Enterprise as boring and derivative. It never delivered the birth of the Federation story it promised. I watched largely because it was a needed break from law school and then because I was recovering from surgery with nothing else better to do. The thrill was gone.
Trek was going downhill because the best writers had dispersed to the wind. Some had been there since 1987. Tracy Torme, Maurice Hurley, Michael Piller (RIP), Ron Moore, Jeri Tayler, Nick Sagan, Michael Sussman, Ira Steven Baer, Ron D. Moore, and Manny Coto are all gone. Rick Berman and Brannon Braga were still around on
Enterprise, but had long since lost their touch. There was not much left to pmp life into the franchise. It my still be that way. Manny Coto has suggested a new series be placed in the 25th century but still in continuity. If the movie is a hit, that may happen, but not before late 2009 and without any of the previous Trek handlers.
I guess when it comes down to it, I do not care whether the new movie is in continuity or a reboot. What I really like about Trek is the nostalgia. All the events of my lie for which it was on the tertiary. I cannot have that again regardless, so there does not seem to be much reason for me to be a continuity freak at any level. O do whatever you like, J. J. Abrams. I do not have anything more to say on the subject.