You know the key piece of evidence PelosiCare is dead on arrival in the Senate? Instead of talking about the bill as Democrats are lining up to battle over the Stupak amendment in order to look good for their constituents, whether pro-choice or pro-life. It is away of “fighting for rights” without actually accomplishing anything just so Democrats will not look bad when they cannot pass the public option even though they have large majorities.
Which leads to three interesting questions:
1. What districts/states are so overwhelmingly pro-choice their representatives have to go to bat in order to protect taxpayer funded abortions?
2. Keeping in mind Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s acknowledgement Roe was intended to control the minority population, what is the percentage of non-white population in states in which senators are adamantly against the Stupak amendment?
3. If the public option is intended to serve as a backdoor for universal health care, then is tax payer funded abortion supposed to lead to forced abortions, infanticide, and euthanasia somewhere down the road. In the name of diminishing carbon footprints, as a for instance? If the purpose of Roe was (and still is) silent racial genocide, it is not far fetched to think so.
Anyone wish to take a crack at these, particularly if you are in favor of abortion?
Monday, November 09, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment